On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Neal Becker <ndbeck...@gmail.com> wrote:
> def F(x):
> return x
>
> x = 2
> F(x) = 3
>
> F(x) = 3
> SyntaxError: can't assign to function call
>
> Do we really need this restriction? There do exist other languages without
> it.
The languages that permit you to assign to a function call all have
some notion of a reference type. In C++, for instance, you can return
a reference to an object, and assigning to the function call achieves
the same thing as assigning to the referent. C has similar semantics
with pointers; you can dereference a returned pointer:
int somevalue;
int *F() {return &somevalue;}
*F() = 5; /* will assign to somevalue */
With Python, there are no pointers, there are no variables. But you
can do something somewhat similar:
>>> x = [0]
>>> def F():
return x
>>> F()[0]=3;
>>> x[0]
3
If you think of x as a pointer to the value x[0], then Python lets you
"dereference" the function return value. But this is fiddling with
terminology; the concept of assigning to a function return value
doesn't really make sense in Python.
Further discussion on exactly _why_ this is the case can be found on
python-list's or python-tutor's archives, such as this excellent post
by Steven D'Aprano:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/tutor/2010-December/080505.html
TLDR: Python != C. :)
ChrisA
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
