On 20 Mar 2013, at 01:03, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Mar 2013 00:50:27 -0700 > Michael Foord <fuzzy...@voidspace.org.uk> wrote: >> >> If you want to add support for additional functionality feel free to propose >> a patch. > > This isn't about additional functionality, this is about > correctness. You don't want to write multiple, slightly different, > implementations of readline() and friends (which is what Python 2 did). > This change allows you to set a series of return values for readlines when mocking open. We are not reading data from anywhere the user is supplying it pre-canned. Do you have a specific problem with it? Michael > Regards > > Antoine. > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.uk _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
