On 3/21/2013 2:23 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 01:19:42 -0400, Terry Reedy <[email protected]> wrote:
How does this look? Is ``replacement`` right? Should the subsequent sm by itself be marked? If so, how? * :meth:`difflib.SequenceMatcher.isbjunk` and :meth:`difflib.SequenceMatcher.isbpopular`: use ``x in sm.bjunk`` and ``x in sm.bpopular``, where sm is a SequenceMatcher object.Looks fine to me. A link on SequenceMatcher probably isn't necessary, but might be handy. If you want to add it it would be :class:`~difflib.SequenceMatcher`.
Committed and pushed. -- Terry Jan Reedy _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
