On 3/21/2013 2:23 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 01:19:42 -0400, Terry Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> wrote:

How does this look? Is ``replacement`` right? Should the subsequent sm
by itself be marked? If so, how?

* :meth:`difflib.SequenceMatcher.isbjunk` and
    :meth:`difflib.SequenceMatcher.isbpopular`: use ``x in sm.bjunk`` and
    ``x in sm.bpopular``, where sm is a SequenceMatcher object.

Looks fine to me.  A link on SequenceMatcher probably isn't necessary,
but might be handy.  If you want to add it it would be
:class:`~difflib.SequenceMatcher`.

Committed and pushed.

--
Terry Jan Reedy

_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to