Am 27.03.2013 um 03:24 schrieb R. David Murray <rdmur...@bitdance.com>:
> On Tue, 26 Mar 2013 16:59:06 -0700, Maciej Fijalkowski <fij...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Sean Felipe Wolfe <ether....@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> Hey everybody how are you all :) >>> >>> I am an intermediate-level python coder looking to get help out. I've >>> been reading over the dev guide about helping increase test coverage >>> --> >>> http://docs.python.org/devguide/coverage.html >>> >>> And also the third-party code coverage referenced in the devguide page: >>> http://coverage.livinglogic.de/ >>> >>> I'm seeing that according to the coverage tool, two of my favorite >>> libraries, urllib/urllib2, have no unit tests? Is that correct or am I >>> reading it wrong? >>> >>> If that's correct it seems like a great place perhaps for me to cut my >>> teeth and I would be excited to learn and help out here. >>> >>> And of course any thoughts or advice for an aspiring Python >>> contributor would be appreciated. Of course the dev guide gives me >>> plenty of good info. >>> >>> Thanks! >> >> That looks like an error in the coverage report, there are certainly >> urllib and urllib2 tests in test/test_urllib* > > The devguide contains instructions for running coverage yourself, > and if I recall correctly the 'fullcoverage' recipe does a better > job than what runs at coverage.livinglogic.de. The job that produces that output has been broken for some time now, and I haven't found the time to look into it. If someone wants to try, here's the code: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pycoco/0.7.2 > […] Servus, Walter _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
