On 4 Apr 2013 14:58, "Eric Snow" <ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6:47 AM, Hrvoje Niksic <hrvoje.nik...@avl.com> wrote: > > It seems like a good feature that an __int__ implementation can choose to > > return an int subclass with additional (and optional) information. After > > all, int subclass instances should be usable everywhere where ints are, > > including in C code. > > Unless you want to try to use the concrete C-API in CPython. In my > experience the concrete API is not very subclass friendly.
Using it with subclasses is an outright bug (except as part of a subclass implementation). Cheers, Nick. > > -eric > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ncoghlan%40gmail.com
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
