Maciej Fijalkowski, 07.04.2013 10:12: > On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 9:51 AM, <martin...@v.loewis.de> wrote: >> Quoting Lennart Regebro: >>> On Sun, Apr 7, 2013 at 7:11 AM, <martin...@v.loewis.de> wrote: >>>> Wrt. to the 3.x migration rate: I think this is a self-fulfilling >>>> prophecy. Migration rate will certainly increase once we announce >>>> an end of 2.7, and then again when the end is actually reached. >>> >>> Well... People are in general *stuck* on Python 2. They are not >>> staying because they want to. So I'm not so sure migration rate will >>> increase because an end is announced or reached. >> >> I assume you say that because people rely on libraries that haven't >> been ported (correct me if there are other reasons to be stuck). > > I'm stuck because I can't tell my users "oh, we didn't improve pypy > for the last year/6 months/3 months, because we were busy upgrading > sources you'll never see to python 3"
Why not? It's not like many people *see* PyPy's sources ever in their life, but my guess is that most of your users will eventually end up *using* those upgraded sources anyway. So those upgrades will also be an improvement for most of them. Stefan _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
