On Fri, 12 Apr 2013 18:35:58 -0400, Barry Warsaw <ba...@python.org> wrote: > On Apr 12, 2013, at 05:17 PM, R. David Murray wrote: > > >Now, you could *further* require that the type of enum values be > >sortable....but that point you really have no excuse for not allowing > >enum values to be compared :) > > I'd be more willing to give up on sorting for the base enum type's iteration > and repr. It's not crucial functionality whereas I still don't want the base > enum values to support ordered comparisons.
That's fine with me. I'm just requesting that it be self-consistent. --David _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
