On May 01, 2013, at 11:04 AM, Eli Bendersky wrote: >Actually, in flufl.enum, IntEnum had to define a magic __value_factory__ >attribute, but in the current ref435 implementation this isn't needed, so >IntEnum is just: > >class IntEnum(int, Enum): > ''' > Class where every instance is a subclass of int. > ''' > >So why don't we just drop IntEnum from the API and tell users they should >do the above explicitly, i.e.:
+1 -Barry _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com