On 15.05.13 14:01, Stefan Drees wrote:
Hi Chris,
On 15.05.13 13:32 Christian Tismer wrote:
Hi Raymond,
On 08.01.13 15:49, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:44 AM, Raymond Hettinger
<raymond.hettin...@gmail.com> wrote:
The current memory layout for dictionaries is
unnecessarily inefficient. It has a sparse table of
24-byte entries containing the hash value, key pointer,
and value pointer.
...
What is the current status of this discussion?
I'd like to know whether it is a considered alternative implementation.
There is also a discussion in python-ideas right now where this
alternative is mentioned, and I think especially for small dicts
as **kwargs, it could be a cheap way to introduce order.
Is this going on, somewhere? I'm quite interested on that.
+1 I am also interested on the status. Many people seemed to have
copied the recipe from the activestate site (was it?) but I wonder if
it maybe was to cool to be progressed into "the field" or simply some
understandable lack of resources?
Right, found the references:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-December/123028.html
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/14664620/python-dictionary-details
http://code.activestate.com/recipes/578375-proof-of-concept-for-a-more-space-efficient-faster/?in=user-178123
cheers - chris
--
Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:tis...@stackless.com>
Software Consulting : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 121 : *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
14482 Potsdam : PGP key -> http://pgp.uni-mainz.de
phone +49 173 24 18 776 fax +49 (30) 700143-0023
PGP 0x57F3BF04 9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619 305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04
whom do you want to sponsor today? http://www.stackless.com/
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
