On 23 maj 2013, at 20:59, PJ Eby <p...@telecommunity.com> wrote: > As to the ability to do multiple types registration, you could support > it only in type annotations, e.g.: > > @func.register > def doit(foo: [int, float]): > ...
Initially I thought so, too. But it seems other people might think this means "a sequence with the first element being an integer, and the second a float". The BDFL seems to have yet a different idea: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2012-December/018129.html This is clearly material for a separate PEP, wink wink, nudge nudge. To the point though. Based on this, and the fact PEP 8 currently disallows annotations within the standard library, I came to the conclusion that currently we should not include the annotation-driven form. > I generally lean towards returning the undecorated function, so that if you > say: > > @func.register > def do_int(foo: int): > ... Me too. The PEP has been updated to specify that explicitly. -- Best regards, Łukasz Langa WWW: http://lukasz.langa.pl/ Twitter: @llanga IRC: ambv on #python-dev _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
