PEP8 consistency is a question to the development team commitment. Nothing prevents you add pep8 checks to build process, contribute fixes.
This inconsistency has been analyzed for various web frameworks recently: http://mindref.blogspot.com/2012/10/python-web-pep8-consistency.html No much in the list are paying attention to this... Andriy ________________________________ > Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 11:48:50 +0200 > From: se8....@gmail.com > To: python-dev@python.org > Subject: [Python-Dev] PEP 8 and function names > > Hi all, > > "There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it." > > We all love this mantra. > > But one thing that often confuses people : function naming. The > standard library is kind of inconsistent. Some functions are separated > by underscores and others aren't. It's not intuitive and new > pythonistas end up constantly reading the doc. (Time saving one char > typing vs time guessing function names.) > > Would it be a good idea to clarify PEP 8 on this ? I mean for future > libraries. > > Regards, > > Sébastien > _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
