On 26 maj 2013, at 03:37, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 9:07 AM, PJ Eby <p...@telecommunity.com> wrote: >> On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Łukasz Langa <luk...@langa.pl> wrote: >>> So, the latest document is live: >>> http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0443/ >>> >>> The code is here: >>> http://hg.python.org/features/pep-443/file/tip/Lib/functools.py#l363 > > Hmm, I find the use of the variable name "dispatch_cache" for a cache > that dispatch() doesn't actually use to be confusing.
Why? It's a cache for dispatches, hence "dispatch_cache". It might not be obvious at first, unless you're Polish ;) > It also doesn't make sense to me that dispatch() itself bypasses the > cache - I would expect all the cache manipulation to be in dispatch(), > and there to be a separate "_find_impl()" function that is invoked to > handle cache misses. This is exactly what I did now. I also exposed ._clear_cache() and the uncached ._find_impl() if somebody finds it necessary to use it. Both are left undocumented. -- Best regards, Łukasz Langa WWW: http://lukasz.langa.pl/ Twitter: @llanga IRC: ambv on #python-dev _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
