On May 29, 2013 1:09 AM, "Nick Coghlan" <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: > >> (FWIW, I think "ModuleManager" is a rather bad name :-) > > > > I'm open to suggestions, but the thing does manage the module so it at > > least makes sense. > > I suggest ModuleInitialiser as the CM name, with a helper function to > make usage read better: > > with initialise_module(name) as m: > # Module initialisation code goes here > # Module is rolled back if initialisation fails
But you're not initializing the module; more like getting the module, either new or from sys.modules. But I thought ModuleGetter seemed too Java-like. Could hide the class behind a get_module function though. > > Cheers, > Nick. > > -- > Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
