On Wed, 29 May 2013 20:10:44 +0200, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote: > On Wed, 29 May 2013 12:55:01 -0400 > Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: > > > Perhaps 'managed_module'? > > > > managed_module is better than managed_initialization. > > I don't understand how it's "managed". "manage", "manager", etc. is the > kind of dumb words everybody uses when they don't manage (!) to explain > what they're talking about. > > My vote is for "module_to_init", "uninitialized_module", > "pristine_module", etc.
Actually, you are right, 'managed_module' isn't much if any better than those. Our problem is that there are two concepts we are trying to cram into one name: what the context manager is managing, and the object that the context manager gives you on entry to the with block. There probably isn't a good answer. I suppose that one approach would be to have a module_initializer context manager return self and then separately call a method on it it to actually load the module inside the with body. But adding more typing to solve a naming issue seems...odd. --David _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
