On 27 cze 2013, at 00:51, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 27 Jun 2013 03:12, "Łukasz Langa" <luk...@langa.pl> wrote: > > This was a mention of an alternative possible syntax. I don't feel it was > > worth keeping this particular one while not discussing any other > > alternatives at all. If you'd rather keep this information, it would be > > better off to have it to an "Alternative approaches" section. > > It was relevant because it was the most acceptable alternative found, and we > *still* didn't think it was an improvement over the status quo. > > We don't generally significantly edit PEPs when accepting or rejecting them. >
Comment restored, point taken. Thanks for clearing this up. -- Best regards, Łukasz Langa WWW: http://lukasz.langa.pl/ Twitter: @llanga IRC: ambv on #python-dev
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
