On 3 Aug 2013 12:45, "Terry Reedy" <tjre...@udel.edu> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/2/2013 10:26 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 3 Aug 2013 11:07, "Terry Reedy" <tjre...@udel.edu
>> <mailto:tjre...@udel.edu>> wrote:
>>  >
>>  > On 8/2/2013 6:19 AM, nick.coghlan wrote:
>>  >
>>  >> +The Python standard library is conservative and requires limiting
>>  >> +lines to 79 characters (and docstrings/comments to 72).
>>  >
>>  >
>>  > If you (and Guido) mean that as a hard limit, then patchcheck should
>> check line lengths as well as trailing whitespace.
>>
>> That raises issues when modifying existing non-compliant files, because
>> it removes the human judgement on whether a non-compliance is worth
>> fixing or not.
>
>
> I meant tools/scripts/patchcheck.py, not the pre-commit hook. The check
would inform (especially for old files) or remind (for new files) so that
judgment could be applied.

Ah, right. Yeah, that may be reasonable.

A warning option on reindent.py may be a place to start if someone wanted
to implement it. Whether or not patchcheck used that option would likely
depend on the initial results of running it manually :)

Cheers,
Nick.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-checkins mailing list
> python-check...@python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-checkins
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to