> The most reasonable thing to do would probably be to share the same > dummy object between setobject.c and dictobject.c, then.
> Raymond, it would be nice if you could take a look! Thanks, I will look at it shortly. Raymond On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net>wrote: > On Sun, 18 Aug 2013 17:31:24 +0100 > Mark Shannon <m...@hotpy.org> wrote: > > > > By giving the dummy object a custom type, the dummy object can be > > recognised by testing that its type equals PySetDummy_Type (or > > whatever it is called) > > > > See dictobject.c for an implementation of a suitable dummy object. > > The most reasonable thing to do would probably be to share the same > dummy object between setobject.c and dictobject.c, then. > > Raymond, it would be nice if you could take a look! > > Regards > > Antoine. > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/raymond.hettinger%40gmail.com >
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
