[Tim, wondering why the 3.2 branch isn't "inactive"] >> ... >> What is gained by _not_ merging here? I don't see it.
[Antoine Pitrou] > Perhaps Georg doesn't like merges? ;-) > I suppose what's gained is "one less command to type". So let's try a different question ;-) Would anyone _object_ to completing the process described in the docs: merge 3.2 into 3.3, then merge 3.3 into default? I'd be happy to do that. I'd throw away all the merge changes except for adding the v3,2.5 tag to .hgtags. The only active branches remaining would be `default` and 2.7, which is what I expected when I started this ;-) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
