On Fri, 13 Sep 2013 23:16:10 +0300 Serhiy Storchaka <storch...@gmail.com> wrote: > 13.09.13 21:40, Antoine Pitrou написав(ла): > > Alternative proposals and questions > > =================================== > > Yet one alternative proposal is to add the dict.__transform__() method. > Actually this not contradict TransformDict, but generalize it. > TransformDict will be just handly interface to __transform__() as > defaultdict to __missing__(). It provides only constructor, repr and > pickling.
Is it an alternative proposal or is it compatible with the PEP? The PEP specifies the API, not the implementation. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
