On Sat, 14 Sep 2013 22:07:50 +0300 Serhiy Storchaka <storch...@gmail.com> wrote: > 14.09.13 20:41, Antoine Pitrou написав(ла): > > On Sat, 14 Sep 2013 09:43:13 -0700 > > Ethan Furman <et...@stoneleaf.us> wrote: > >> Still, I think it would be useful to expose the transform function. > >> Any good reason not to? > > > > No good reason. What's the name? transform_func? > > There is one reason -- serialization. For example pickle saves the > transform function as an argument for TransformDict constructor. Repr > exposes the transform function too (in evaluable representation). Other > serializers need the transform function too. My implementations expose > it as public property (transform), your -- as private attribute > (_transform). > > Or perhaps I misunderstood you?
"No good reason" not to expose it. It was a double negation, sorry ;-) Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
