On Sep 26, 2013, at 10:28 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote:
> Le Thu, 26 Sep 2013 10:22:55 -0400, > Donald Stufft <don...@stufft.io> a écrit : >> Ideally people won't be typing either of them because it'll be >> installed automatically. They might in some cases (accidentally >> uninstalled pip?) > > Installing from source perhaps. Ah yea, installing from source is the time when they'd execute it, that slipped my mind. > >> I agree that it seems there is paranoia going on here and that the >> risk is low and making it just be a special cased new feature is ok. >> However the point of the underscore prefix on 2.7 and 3.3 is to more >> effectively communicate that on these pythons you shouldn't rely on >> that module existing. > > That's a fair argument, although it also makes the thing a bit ugly. Yea It's not my preferred thing to do and I think that calling it just ensurepip is fine, however I think if folks are worried about it, it could offer a compromise. ----------------- Donald Stufft PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
