On 9/26/2013 3:17 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 26 September 2013 16:53, Georg Brandl <g.bra...@gmx.net> wrote:
Sure, that's doable, but it dumps the full repr of "obj" in the middle
of the sentence. The thing that's not practical is the neat and tidy
wording Georg proposed, because the thing passed as "obj" is actually
an arbitrary Python object that may have a messy repr (like a bound
method, which is what gets passed in the __del__ case), so there's
definite merit in keeping that repr at the *end* of the header line.
Then this should be fine, I guess?
Exception caught and not propagated in: <....>
Sure. I still prefer something like "Could not propagate exception
from:" or "Caller could not propagate exception from <repr>" that
better indicates we're suppressing it because it's infeasible to raise
it rather than just because we feel like it, but any of them would
offer a decent improvement over the status quo.
With the full traceback printed, with the line where the exception
originated, I do not think that the representation of the object is
needed. It was a substitute for the traceback.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
