On 12 October 2013 01:53, Victor Stinner <victor.stin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> t's easy to mix up PEP numbers. For example, Martin von Loewis wrote
> two major PEP related to Unicode: 383 and 393. These numbers are
> close, only one digit is different. It's worse when you discuss recent
> PEPs: PEP 445 or PEP 454? Oops, no it was the PEP 455.

I think that the real issue is that people expect others to remember
numbers as easily as they do while writing emails, etc. If in email
people refer to PEPs as PEP 302 (Import Hooks) or PEP 3156 (Tulip) or
PEP 435 (Enum) etc, there would be a lot less issue.

We're all guilty of it, and context is often enough to clarify, but
IMO this is more about thinking of your audience when writing.

Paul
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to