On Sat, 12 Oct 2013 22:25:36 +0200
Georg Brandl <g.bra...@gmx.net> wrote:
> >> > ("limited API" is really a bad synonym for "stable ABI" IMO)
> >>
> >> It's not a synonym: to get a stable ABI, you use the limited API.
> >
> > I still don't like that name, because it doesn't convey any interesting
> > information. "Stable ABI" is immediately informative.
>
> It can be changed, but we document the C API, not an ABI.
This is a rather mistaken statement. The only point of using the
"limited API" is because it provides the stable ABI. There is *zero*
other reason of caring about it.
Regards
Antoine.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
