Am 12.10.2013 23:04, schrieb Gregory P. Smith: > agreed with any of these three.
I'm going for hashlib.pbkdf2_hmac() for now. Right now it's just one function. We can always add a new module for a high level interface later. > that also makes sense... > > I'd leave hmac.py around through at least 3.6 but going ahead and moving > the implementation into hashlib in 3.4 makes sense. That gives us the opportunity th provide a faster implementation based on OpenSSL's HMAC API http://www.openssl.org/docs/crypto/hmac.html . I'm also tempted to provide a fast one-shot-wonder function that returns the MAC as bytes: hmac(name, key, value) -> result Christian _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
