How about if Brett and Nick both agree that it's good, I approve it? If either one wants more discussion I'll appoint them the PEP-BDFL.
On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Eric Snow <ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Eric Snow <ericsnowcurren...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Any comments? Usually silence implies no disapproval. ;) PEP 451 did >> go through several rounds of review on import-sig, so I'm not going to >> stress over low feedback at this point. However, I'd particularly >> appreciate knowing if there are any objections to ModuleSpec for 3.4. >> Otherwise I'd like to get pronouncement on the PEP. Thanks! > > Okay, no objections and the PEP has not changed. I'd like > pronouncement on PEP 451. > > Guido, if you feel so inclined as to delegate and either of them is > willing, Brett and Nick are both familiar with the PEP, having been > heavily involved in earlier discussions. Thanks! > > -eric -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
