On 11/16/2013 8:39 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Trent, I watched your video and read your slides.
I only read the slides.
(Does the word "motormouth" mean anything to you? :-)
The extra background (and repetition) was helpful to me in filling in things, especially about Windows, that I could not follow in the discussion a year ago. But I noticed that it might be tedious to people already familiar with the subject.
Clearly your work isn't ready for python-dev -- it is just too speculative. I've moved python-dev to BCC and added python-ideas. It possibly doesn't even belong on python-ideas -- if you are serious about wanting to change Linux or other *NIX variants, you'll have to go find a venue where people who do forward-looking kernel work hang out.
A working and useful Windows-only PyParallel (integrated with CPython or not) might help stimulate open-source *nix improvements to match the new Windows stuff.
Finally, I'm not sure why you are so confrontational about the way Twisted and Tulip do things. We are doing things the only way they *can* be done without overhauling the entire CPython implementation (which you have proven will take several major release cycles, probably until 4.0). It's fine that you are looking further forward than most of us. I don't think it makes sense that you are blaming the rest of us for writing libraries that can be used today.
Just reading the slides, I did not pick up as much confrontation and blame as you did. I certainly appreciate that asyncio is working *now*, and on all three major target systems. I look forward to looking at the doc when it is added. I will understand a bit better for having read Trent's slides.
-- Terry Jan Reedy _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
