On 1/4/14 10:42 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
Luca Sbardella <luca.sbarde...@gmail.com> writes:
you are my heroes but this survey is quite useless, can you include more
people?
The survey cohort was self-selected from those who read the forums where
it was posted.
I wasn't aware of it so many thousands of python users.
That statement confuses me. Were you aware of it, or not? How did you
become aware of it?
And after that, you are well aware that Python 3 or 2 is becoming a
liability, just stick with one, anyone (3) at this point.
The policy of the Python core developers is quite clear, and has been
for many years: Python 2 is a dead end, and Python 2.7 (released
2010-07-03, 3½ years ago) is the last Python 2.
Python 2.7 is the last of the Python 2 line, there will never be new
Python 2 features <URL:http://python.org/dev/peps/pep-0404/>, everyone
should migrate to Python 3.
That is already the Python core developers's published policy. So, to
whom are you speaking here on the Python core developers' forum?
I don't want to go and learn a new language, please.
Great! If you already know Python, then there is very little (certainly
not “a new language”) different to move from Python 2.7 to Python 3.
Enjoy!
I think it helps Luca and many others (including myself) if there is a
reference of the difference between 2.7 and Python 3.3+.
There are PEPs and books, but is there any such long list of references?
If not, should we start investing in one? I know the basic one such as
xrange and range, items vs iteritems, izip vs zip that sort of uniform
syntax/library inclusion difference.
If there is such reference available?
Yeuk Hon
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
