Am 07.01.2014 12:16, schrieb Antoine Pitrou: > On Tue, 07 Jan 2014 11:33:55 +0100 > Georg Brandl <g.bra...@gmx.net> wrote: >> >> The proposal would be to focus entirely on addressing these roadblocks >> in the 3.5 version, and no other new features -- the release cycle >> needn't be 18 months for this one. This is similar to the moratorium >> for 3.2, but that one came too early for 3.x porting to really profit. > > The moratorium was for alternate Python implementations IIRC, not for > porting third-party libraries.
Yes, but this would be a similar moratorium with another purpose. >> It would be very cool to have multiple projects working together with >> us for this, and at the release of 3.5 final, present (say) a Mercurial >> that works on 2.5 and 3.5. > > You seem to be forgetting that we are only one part of the equation > here. Unless you want to tackle Mercurial and Twisted porting yourself? > Good luck with that. No no, I did not forget :) that's why I wrote "working together with them". It would need to be coordinated with the external projects, but from what I've seen there are willing people. Georg _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
