On 14 Jan 2014 03:34, "Guido van Rossum" <gu...@python.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 13 January 2014 23:57, Augie Fackler <r...@durin42.com> wrote: > >> 1) What do we need in terms of functionality > >> > >> Best guess, %s, %d, and %f. I've not done a full audit of the code, but some > >> limited looking over the grep hits for % in .py files suggests I'm right, > >> and we could even do without %f (we only use that for 'hg --time' output, > >> which we could do in unicode). > > > > I think PEP 460 will have you covered there, or hopefully asciistr on 3.3+ > > I'm confused on how PEP 460 would help -- Augie mentioned %d, which it excludes.
I meant your proposed more lenient version (since there's no need for the binary only version to be in the common 2/3 subset). Cheers, Nick. > > -- > --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
