On 1/13/2014 1:59 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Glenn Linderman <[email protected]> wrote:On 1/13/2014 12:09 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:Yeah, the %s behavior with a string argument was a messy attempt at compromise. I was hoping to mimick a common use of %s in Python 2, where it can be used with either an 8-bit string or a number as argument, acting like %b in the former case and like %d in the latter case. Not having %s at all in Python 3 means that porting requires more thinking (== more opportunity for mistakes when you're converting in bulk) and there's no easy way to write code that works in Python 2 and 3. If we have %b for strictly interpolating bytes, I'm fine with adding %a for calling ascii() on the argument and then interpolating the result after ASCII-encoding it. If somehow (unlikely though it seems) we end up keeping %s (e.g. strictly to ease porting), we could also keep %r as an alias for %a. %s for strictly interpolating bytes eases porting. Sad name, but good for compatibility. When the blowup happens, due to having a str type passed, the porter adds the appropriate .encode(...) to the parameter, so it doesn't blow up on Py 3, and it'll be OK for Py 2 as well, will it not?Lots of code uses %s with numbers too, and probably the occasional None or list (relying on the Python 2 near-guarantee that most objects' str() is their repr() and that repr() nearly guarantees to return only ASCII). E.g. I'm sure you can find live code doing something like headers.append('Content-Length: %s\r\n' % len(body))
That's portably fixable by switching to %d... or by adding .encode('ascii')
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
