On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Larry Hastings <la...@hastings.org> wrote: > I have now received exactly zero feedback about the prototype, which > suggests people aren't using it.
Oops, I had half a post written about this two days ago, but never got it posted. I did some experimenting on winreg.c (see http://hg.python.org/sandbox/zware/file/prototype_clinic/PC/winreg.c), and I have to say I really really like having most of the output shunted down to the bottom of the file. In that example I have only the implementation outputting to the block, and everything else (that's necessary) going into the buffer; to me it looks very nice and clean. One of my biggest annoyances with the current output is having the docstring repeated nearly verbatim (with additives) within just a few lines, and this takes care of that and more. To me, those converted functions read about as close to real Python as is ever going to happen in a C file. One thing that I could see being useful (though possibly not easy) is the ability to dump a buffer "late"; for example, near the top of the file: /*[clinic input] destination prototypes new buffer output parser_prototype prototypes dump prototypes later [clinic start generated code]*/ Then process the file, filling the prototypes buffer as we go. At the end of the file, go back and dump the buffer in that output block. I like the flexibility of the prototype, having more control over what goes where is always nice :) -- Zach _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
