On 02/16/2014 04:03 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
Hi,
The PEP 436 is still a draft and not mentionned in Python 3.4
changelog. The PEP proposes to add a DSL, not to modify all modules
implemented in C. I think that it should be marked as Final and
mentionned in the changelog.
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0436/
I need to clean it up and submit it for final inspection. This is on my
to-do list for before 3.4.0 final.
2014-02-16 19:31 GMT+01:00 Larry Hastings <la...@hastings.org>:
1) We merge the Derby patch for the builtins module into 3.4, simply because
it will "demo well".
Where is the issue to implement this feature? Anyway, I expect a huge
patch which is non-trivial and so very risky for such a very important
module :-/ It's too late IMO.
http://bugs.python.org/issue20184
The point is that it *is* trivial and not particularly risky. Doing
this right means that we execute essentially the same statements in the
same order, merely split across two functions, and with a slightly
different docstring. Literally the only detectable runtime difference
that should exist after applying the patch is that the functions now
publish docstrings.
//arry/
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
