Am 19.02.2014 19:00, schrieb Georg Brandl: > Am 19.02.2014 16:50, schrieb Guido van Rossum: >> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 1:42 AM, Georg Brandl <g.bra...@gmx.net >> <mailto:g.bra...@gmx.net>> wrote: >> >> Am 19.02.2014 00:54, schrieb Barry Warsaw: >> > On Feb 19, 2014, at 12:38 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: >> > >> >>Am 17.02.2014 00:25, schrieb Larry Hastings: >> >>> And my local branch will remain private until 3.4.0 final ships! >> >> >> >>sorry, but this is so wrong. Is there *any* reason why to keep this >> branch >> >>private? >> > >> > IMO, no. read-only for !larry sure, but not private. >> >> I emphatically agree. There is no need at all for secrecy, or paranoia. >> >> And it is very understandable that vendors (or even "just" our binary >> building experts) want to make as many tests with what will be RC2 and >> then final as they can, to catch possible issues before release. >> >> >> That's why it's RC2 and not 3.4final, right? Once Larry says it's baked, >> everyone *will* have a chance to test it. What value is a preview of the >> preview >> really going to add? > > Ned told me just a few days ago that he does regular pre-tag builds of the OSX > installers, and as for the Debian/Ubuntu side Barry can say more. The thing > with the RCs is that as long as you add patches during the RC phase (which is > more or less unavoidable if the schedule is to be kept), the state of the > release branch can only profit from more eyes.
There's even some helpful people on #python-dev (like Arfrever from Gentoo) who frequently do post-push reviews, catching embarrassing bugs before they can sneak their way into a release (thank you Arfrever!). OK, that's my reasoning, I'm going to fucking shut up now. Georg _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
