On 3/2/2014 1:51 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 4:07 PM, Terry Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> wrote:
On 3/1/2014 7:11 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
I have a couple of patches outstanding, notably issue 20249 [2], which
is a small change, has a patch, and has no activity or nosying since
its creation.
And the other?
http://bugs.python.org/issue19494 has a patch that I uploaded, but
it's more accurately someone else's patch and I just made a slight
tweak to it.
The line numbers in your patch do not match the line numbers in the 3.4
file. Did you prepare against 3.3?
The base issue here is a policy question about accommodating violations
of the standard. The main maintainer of the urllib.requests module is
Senthil. I would not decide the policy question.
http://bugs.python.org/issue20729 is an issue that I opened, and
there's a patch at the issue, but I didn't write the patch.
I think Serhiy's patch is 'conservative', so I could look at it and see
if I agree that it is the right minimal change.
Technically, neither really counts,
Martin's offer was to review a patch that one wanted reviewed, not
necessarily one that one wrote.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
