On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Jim J. Jewett <jimjjew...@gmail.com> wrote: > The PEP should therefore explicitly state that implementation details > may force the deferral to be permanent, and that this is considered an > acceptable trade-off.
How about words to this effect? """Should there be, in future, a way to create a true subscope (which could simplify comprehensions, except expressions, with blocks, and possibly more), then this proposal could be revived; until then, its loss is not a great one...""" (I parked the time machine in the PSU's garage, thanks for lending me it!) (The PSU does not exist, and therefore does not have a garage.) ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
