2014-03-08 16:30 GMT+01:00 Maciej Fijalkowski <fij...@gmail.com>: > How about fixing cyclic gc to deal with __del__ instead? That sounds > like an awful change to the semantics.
Hum? That's the purpose of the PEP 442 which is implemented in Python 3.4. As I wrote, it's not enough to fix all issues. Usually, I see an explicit call to gc.collect() as a workaround to a deeper issue. I prefer to modify my program to run smoothly without explict garbage collection. That's why I would prefer to avoid creating reference cycles from the beginning. Victor _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
