On 25 March 2014 08:26, Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote: > Exactly the same. If someone wants to distribute SEPython (that > someone might be python.org itself, or ActiveState, or anyone else who > has an interest in it), they're welcome to do so; and it could be done > either as an all-in-one that packages all of CPython, or as an add-on; > either way would work just as well, but the former would be cleaner.
Reading this I suspect we're mostly in agreement but having trouble communicating. My understanding of your point is simply that you don't want python-dev to 'bless' either of the 2.7 releases proposed as _the_ 2.7 release, instead pushing that choice on to people distributing Python. I can get behind that plan so long as the source code releases are named in such a way that people are either a) forced to make a choice; or b) defaulted to secure 2.7. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
