Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Nikolaus Rath <nikol...@rath.org> wrote:
>> 2. Change the behavior immediately, potentially breaking some
>> applications that worked around it, but unbreaking others that relied
>> on the documented behavior.
>
> If it's a functionality change that's likely to break code, would it
> be worth changing it only in 3.5, and documenting it as broken in 3.4
> and earlier?
Yes, that's what I meant. I don't think changing it in 3.4 is an option
at all.
Best,
-Nikolaus
--
Encrypted emails preferred.
PGP fingerprint: 5B93 61F8 4EA2 E279 ABF6 02CF A9AD B7F8 AE4E 425C
»Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
