On Fri, 28 Mar 2014 11:19:52 -0500 Skip Montanaro <s...@pobox.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Alexander Belopolsky > <alexander.belopol...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Is it open to debate or is it now cast in stone? > > > > I think the barrier for changing str() is lower than that for changing > > repr(), but I would be against any changes in this area. (I may have had a > > different view if ISO 8601 syntax for timedeltas was not so ugly. :-) > > I think str() should be left alone. It's clear there is no one best > str representation for timedelta objects.
But at least we could have one that isn't terribly confusing :-) Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
