On Thu, 03 Apr 2014 09:59:55 -0400, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Skip Montanaro <s...@pobox.com> wrote: > > > I saw mention recently of Python 4 and assumed all such references > > were either April Fool's jokes or pie-in-the-sky dreams for a new > > version of Python which may never arrive. > > > > It's the latter. Some of us have been tossing around "Python 4" like we did > "Py3k" before we starting Python 3 in earnest; maybe we should make sure to > say Py4k to be perfectly clear there are no Python 4 plans ATM.
I think Python4 is just what follows python 3.9, myself :). More seriously, I don't believe there should ever be a Py4k the way there was a Py3k, and would prefer not to feed any rumours that there might be. --David _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
