On Wed, Apr 9, 2014, at 18:43, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Benjamin Peterson <benja...@python.org> > wrote: > > Planning-on-making-2.7-releases-'til-the-cows-come-home-ly yours, > > Past 2.7.9, will you make 2.7.10 etc, or does that violate other > policies?
I'm not aware that two digit minor version numbers violate anything but some people's aesthetic senses. > > What will a lack of provided installers do to Windows support? It's > easy enough on Linux to say "either build it from source, or let your > upstream package provider build it for you", but AIUI, most Windows > users want to get a ready-made binary. It's not that I don't think Windows installers are important, but rather that Martin has indicated he is (completely reasonably) not interested in indefinitely making 2.7 installers. > > Apologies if these questions were answered at the Summit. Montreal's > treatment of thirty-person-parties at one hour's notice may or may not > be considered a bug to be fixed in 2.7, but its geographic barrier to > Australians is definitely a feature addition. And will need to be > thoroughly bikeshedded on -ideas before implementation (can the time > machine be used to travel in relative dimensions in space?) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
