Can we please stop the argument about Hg vs. Git?
On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 2:40 AM, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> > wrote: > > Le 15/04/2014 09:45, Chris Angelico a écrit : > > > >> > >> Specific use-case that I can see: Mercurial. In a git vs hg shoot-out, > >> git will usually win on performance, and hg is using Py2; > > > > > > Keep in mind those shoot-outs usually rely on large repositories and/or > > non-trivial operations, so startup time is not necessarily a significant > > contributor in Mercurial "being slower" (when it actually is slower than > > git, which may not be all the time). > > I'm talking also about the feel of actual daily use, partly on big > repos like git (git), CPython (hg), and Pike (git), and partly on some > smaller ones. Whether it's startup cost or operational cost I don't > know, but if I want it consistently fast, I generally go for git. > > ChrisA > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org > -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
