On Apr 18, 2014, at 4:50 PM, Donald Stufft <don...@stufft.io> wrote:
> So I’m not really worried about a competition or anything. I’m mostly worried > about confusion of users. What you’re suggestion we give to use is *two* ways > to install Python packages (and 2 or 3 ways to virtualize a Python instance). > That provides extra cognitive burden for people who are new to Python. They > have to both understand that the packages you install from Conda are different > than the ones you install from pip, and that they come from different places. > If a new user is reasonably likely to have to use ``pip install`` when they > are > using pip, then I think that provides a worse experience than only having to > use one tool to manage your packages. This confusion is going to be worse when > new users find a library they want to use and it tells them to use > ``pip install`` (or even easy_install!) even if Anaconda itself has a package > inside of it. Typo - When they are using conda. ----------------- Donald Stufft PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
