Paul Sokolovsky <pmis...@gmail.com> wrote: > In this regard, I'm glad to participate in mind-resetting discussion. > So, let's reiterate - there's nothing like "the best", "the only right", > "the only correct", "righter than", "more correct than" in CPython's > implementation of Unicode storage. It is *arbitrary*. Well, sure, it's > not arbitrary, but based on requirements, and these requirements match > CPython's (implied) usage model well enough. But among all possible > sets of requirements, CPython's requirements are no more valid that > other possible. And other set of requirement fairly clearly lead to > situation where CPython implementation is rejected as not correct for > those requirements at all.
Several core-devs have said that using UTF-8 for MicroPython is perfectly okay. I also think it's the right choice and I hope that you guys come up with a very efficient implementation. Stefan Krah _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
