On Jun 6, 2014, at 3:04 PM, Brian Curtin <br...@python.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 10:56 PM, <dw+python-...@hmmz.org> wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 06, 2014 at 10:49:24PM +0400, Brian Curtin wrote: >> >>> None of the options are particularly good, but yes, I think that's an >>> option we have to consider. We're supporting 2.7.x for 6 more years on >>> a compiler that is already 6 years old. >> >> Surely that is infinitely less desirable than simply bumping the minor >> version? > > It's definitely not desirable, but "simply" bumping the minor version > is not A Thing.
Why? I mean even if it’s the same thing as 2.7 just with an updated compiler that seems like a better answer than having to deal with 2.7.whatever suddenly breaking all C exts. ----------------- Donald Stufft PGP: 0x6E3CBCE93372DCFA // 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
