Brett Cannon <bcan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Nope. A new minor release of Python is a massive undertaking which is why > we have saved ourselves the hassle of doing a Python 2.8 or not giving a > clear signal as to when Python 2.x will end as a language.
Why not just define Python 2.8 as Python 2.7 except with a newer compiler? I cannot see why that would be massive undertaking, if changing compiler for 2.7 is neccesary anyway. Sturla _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
