On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 20:43:41 +0200, francis <franci...@email.de> wrote: > On 06/24/2014 03:50 AM, Ezio Melotti wrote: > >>From the first graph you can see that out of the 4500+ open issues, > > about 2000 have a patch. > One would like to start with the ones that are bugs ;-) and see some > status line trying to drop to 0 (is that possible :-) ?) > > > We need more reviewers and committers :) > more patch writers: yes, > more patch reviewers: yes,
Anyone can review patches, in case that isn't clear. > more committers: ?? automate!! :-) That's a goal of the python-workflow interest group. Unfortunately between billable work and GSOC mentoring I haven't had time to do much there lately. Our first goal is to make the review step easier to manage (know which patches really need review, be able to list patches where community review is thought to be complete) by improving the tracker, then we'll look at creating the patch gating system Nick has talked about previously. Still needs a committer to approve the patch, but it should increase the throughput considerably. In the meantime, something that would help would be if people would do reviews and say on the issue "I think this is commit ready" and have the issue moved to 'commit review' stage. Do that a few times where people who are already triagers/committers agree with you, and you'll get triage privileges on the tracker. --David _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
