On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Antoine Pitrou <anto...@python.org> wrote: > For the same reason, I agree with Victor that we should ditch the > threading-disabled builds. It's too much of a hassle for no actual, > practical benefit. People who want a threadless unicodeless Python can > install Python 1.5.2 for all I care.
Or some other implementation of Python. It's looking like micropython will be permanently supporting a non-Unicode build (although I stepped away from the project after a strong disagreement over what would and would not make sense, and haven't been following it since). If someone wants a Python that doesn't have stuff that the core CPython devs treat as essential, s/he probably wants something like uPy anyway. ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
