On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Mark Lawrence <breamore...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> I'm just curious as to why there are 54 open issues after both of these > PEPs have been accepted and 384 is listed as finished. Did we hit some > unforeseen technical problem which stalled development? I tried to bring some sanity to that effort by opening a "meta issue": http://bugs.python.org/issue15787 My enthusiasm, however, vanished after I reviewed the refactoring for the datetime module: http://bugs.python.org/issue15390 My main objections are to following PEP 384 <http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0384/> (Stable ABI) within stdlib modules. I see little benefit for the stdlib (which is shipped fresh with every new version of Python) from following those guidelines.
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
